Status: The Marquette County Road Commission, represented by the Pacific Legal Foundation, continues to appeal the US District Court’s denial of their lawsuit against the EPA. The lawsuit is funded by undisclosed contributions to “Stand UP”, a 501c4 dark money group. The Marquette County Road Commission is suing the Environmental Protection Agency following their failed effort to push through the “County Road 595” (CR 595), a mine haul route thinly disguised as a public infrastructure plan. The CR 595 route would cut through the wild, undeveloped heart of Marquette County, in order to connect Eagle Mine with the Eagle’s Humboldt Mill. Eagle Mine LLC is owned by Lundin Mining. CR 595’s first incarnation was the “Woodland Road” and “South Road”, promoted by Kennecott / Rio Tinto while Eagle Mine was still in the permitting phase. Clearly designed to start at Eagle Mine and end at the Humboldt Mill, the road would serve a single foreign corporation. It was not designed to benefit the public.
From the beginning, the environmentally destructive County Road 595 project has been strongly opposed by coalition of concerned citizens, local residents, tribal members, watersheds, and regional environmental organizations. The proposed CR 595 route would have crossed 22 rivers and streams, including the Dead River and Yellow Dog River Watersheds, the Middle Branch of the Escanaba River, Mulligan Creek headwaters, Voelker Creek, and Wildcat Canyon Creek, destroying approximately 25 acres of wetlands, directly impacting 122 wetland complexes, and bisecting a major wildlife corridor, fragmenting both habitat and hydrology.
Controversial History of the CR 595 Proposal – A Mining Haul Road
- CR 595 Position Statement by Democratic Candidate Sara Cambensy | November 2017
- Letter to the Editor, Mining Journal re: “Rich Rossway’s television ad addressing Marquette County Road 595” | November 2017
- House candidates square off (CR 595 becomes a campaign issue?) | October 2017
- “Let Yoopers proceed with road project” opinion by Mark Miller (Note: Miller is representing the Marquette County Road Commission in their lawsuit against the EPA) | October 2017
- Wall Street Journal Prints ‘Alternative Facts’ By Lawyers Appealing CR 595 | March 2017
- Pacific Legal Foundation joins local officials in 595 appeal | February 2017
- County Road 595 reconsideration denied; plans set to appeal decision | December 2016
- CR 595 Hits Another Snag | December 2016
- Marquette County Road Commission holding press conference on County Road 595 | August 2016
- Environmentalists Applaud Dismissal of 595 Lawsuit | June 2016
- Justifications questioned as Road Commission sues EPA | February 2015
- Political grandstanding on behalf of CR-595 | February 2015
- County Road 595: A bad idea in the wrong place | February 2015
- CR-595 – Under Construction? | July 2014
- CR-595 Back among the Living? Not so quick | December 2013
- Marquette County Road Commission – Triple A and CR 510 | archives
- Transportation Update | October 2013
- Here is an example of what a compromise is NOT | November 2013
- To the Editor: Road to Ruin | April 2013
- Letters to the Natural Resources Committee regarding CR 595 | March 2013
- To the editor: EPA does job | February 2013
- To the Editor: EPA was Right | February 2013
- Fallout from County Road 595 decision continues | January 2013
- CR 595 Plans Dropped – Victory for now, but the fight’s not over | January 2013
- Reps push EPA on CR 595 | November 2012
- CR 595 decision delayed again | October 2012
- KBIC member comments on CR 595 | September 2012
- EPA notes CR 595 objections | August 2012
- Road is opposed | August 2012
- Company is liable | August 2012
- Alternative proposed | August 2012
- CR 595 debated at forum | August 2012
- EPA Public Hearing on Wetland Fill Permit Application for CR-595 | August 2012
- Mine must obey rules | May 2012
- Citizen Comment: CR 595 is nothing but a Kennecott Haul Road | February 2012
- DEQ schedules public hearing for proposed CR 595 | February 2012
- Proposed Kennecott Haul Road: Public Informational Open Houses Scheduled | August 2011
- Great Lakes Echo:Kennecott loses road decision; worries intensify over U.P. mine | March 2011
- Kennecott changes ore hauling plan | January 2011
- Walk for the Woodlands (Haul Road Protest) | October 2010
- County/Kennecott ‘Woodland Road’ Decision Expected | October 2010
- Native Plant Walk along Woodland Road | August 2010
- Road Forum Scheduled for June 30 | June 2010
- Kennecott Withdraws Woodland Road Wetlands Permit | May 2010
- Mine Opponents Comment on Woodland Road Plan | April 2010
- GOOD NEWS: EPA Says “NO” to Woodland Road | March 2010
- Woodland Road – Written Comment Accepted Until 20th | February 2010
- Woodland Road Hearing: Permit Analysis | February 2010
- Kennecott’s South Road: Map and Public Hearing Minutes | October 2009
Marquette County Road Commission Document Archives
- County Road 595 – Statement of Qualifications (contractors)
- County Road 595 Documents
- Marquette County Road Commission – CR-595 USEPA Appeal
- Marquette County Road Commission – County Road 595 Complaint As Filed
- Marquette County Road Commission vs. EPA Docs
- Marquette County Road Commission represented by Pacific Legal Foundation