New Sulfide Mining Documentary Show Times and Locations

Mining Madness, Water Wars: The Great Lakes in the Balance
A Documentary Film on Sulfide Mining

“Mining Madness, Water Wars: The Great Lakes in the Balance” is a timely, compelling documentary that lays bare a controversial proposal to blast a mine beneath a blue ribbon trout stream in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula.

The 33-minute story is told through the passionate voices of scientists, community activists, tribal officials, and others who care about protecting our most precious asset water. Watch a short excerpt that focuses on one aspect of the controversy — the apparent disregard for Native American treaty rights.

Despite extensive scientific testimony that the project’s flaws could place workers in peril and jeopardize a Lake Superior tributary and its watershed, citizens and environmental organizations have found the state’s leadership unresponsive and now look to the justice system for resolution.

“Mining Madness, Water Wars: The Great Lakes in the Balance” was underwritten by the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation and produced by Brauer Productions, Inc. and Summit Public Relations Strategies, LLC.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwFT1cuRyrY[/youtube]

“An easy tutorial on one of the most momentous environmental battles in Michigan history”
–Lawrence Cosentino
Lansing City Pulse

Kennecott Lacks State, Federal Permits to Proceed With Mine Plan

Kennecott Minerals Co. currently lacks all major state and federal permits required in order to open and operate its proposed Eagle Project metallic sulfide mine on the Yellow Dog Plains, in Marquette County.

Recently, the company purchased the site of the old Humboldt Mill, in Humboldt Township, that was used to crush ore from Callahan Mining Company’s Ropes Gold Mine decades ago.

Although Kennecott has yet to submit a permit for its processing complex, Eagle Project manager, Jon Cherry, claimed, at an October 6 meeting, that the mill will be operational by 2010.

Local Save the Wild UP Director, Kristi Mills, said “For Kennecott to announce that it is moving forward with its Eagle Project and Humboldt mill plan is grossly pre-mature when you consider the big picture. They have neither the legal permits nor public consent to boast their achievements.”

According to Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) deputy director Jim Sygo, at Humboldt, “There are Waters of the State issues, and the site is a facility under [Part 632, the new metallic mining law], which will generate significant issues to permit this site.”

In a July, 2008 letter, Sygo acknowledged “that the reopening of the Humboldt processing facility would require a separate permit.”

Sygo also acknowledged that Kennecott “would have to apply for an amendment of the Mining Permit for construction of a new haul road and would likely need permits under Part 301, Inland Lakes and Streams and Part 303, Wetlands Protection…as well.”

Regarding the company’s plans to power the mine, Sygo said that Kennecott “would have to apply for an amendment to its Part 632 Mining Permit before beginning activities to extend electrical service from CR 550 to the Eagle Project mine site.”

A mining permit for the Humboldt facility will require State review of Kennecott’s application and public hearings before approval would be considered.  Construction of their own haul road and extension of electric utilities will require Kennecott to amend its Mining Permit, effectively restarting the permitting process with public hearings and another DEQ decision.

To further complicate its plans, Kennecott lacks a required underground injection permit from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has also requested that the EPA conduct studies relating to the endangered Kirtland’s warbler and the threatened Canada lynx before issuing a decision on Kennecott’s federal permit.  The USFWS has suggested that potential mining affects to the native Coaster Brook Trout could also complicate Kennecott’s application process. The USFWS will issue a 12 month finding on the petition on December.

Letter from YDWP Explaining Flaws in Alger Delta / Kennecott Plan

July 10, 2008

Mr. Tom Harrell
Alger Delta Cooperative Electric Association
426 N. 9th St.
Gladstone, MI 49837

RE: Kennecott Eagle Minerals Company Electric Service

Dear Mr. Harrell,

As we discussed at our meeting with the Marquette County Road Commission and other interested parties, it is important for Alger Delta to recognize the legal issues regarding the upgrade of existing service along CR 550 and the extension of existing services with the installation of new service along CR 510 and CR AAA to the Kennecott Eagle Mineral Company (KEMC) proposed mine site on the Yellow Dog Plains. As we discussed, the following of Non-Ferrous Metallic Mine permit statute (commonly known as Part 632) pertain to this project:

R 425.103(a) the definition of ‘mining activity’ includes (iv) Beneficiation; (x) Construction of haul roads; and (xi) Construction of utilities or extension of existing utilities.
R4 25.202 Environmental Impact Assessment shall be required for: (q) Existing and proposed infrastructure and utilities
R 425.204 Reclamation Plan (iii) ‘all . . .infrastructure . . . constructed as a result of the mining activities shall be removed, unless they are converted to an alternate use in accordance with the proposed final land use.’
Kennecott is currently not permitted to do any work related to the project since the permits are not final due to:

1. Ongoing Contested Case proceedings with the State of Michigan regarding the mining permit,
the air permit and the ground water discharge permit
2. The unmet requirement for KEMC to obtain an Underground Injection Control permit from the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
3. The lease from the State of Michigan allowing KEMC to use state land for this proposed
operation is not finalized

It is the opinion of our organization and of our attorneys, that Kennecott’s current mining application and the subsequent permit issued, do not permit for the work Kennecott has contracted with Alger Delta in the extension of power to the proposed mine site. The current mining permit stipulates the use of diesel generators at the site, not electrical service provided by a utility. Subsequently, KEMC has not submitted an amendment request to the DEQ changing the existing permit as required by the statute and rules of the Non-Ferrous Metallic Mine permit process (commonly known as Part 632). Under these rules the following language applies as taken directly from the Part 632 rules:

R 425.206 Amendment of permits.

Rule 206. (1) A mining permit may be amended at any time to address changes in the mining operation, natural or humanmade conditions, or technology, or to correct an oversight. An application for amendment of a mining permit shall be submitted on a form prescribed by the department, signed by the permittee or an authorized representative of the permittee. The application shall include revisions of any of the following that are affected by the changes:

(a) The environmental impact assessment.
(b) The mining, reclamation, and environmental protection plan.
(c) The contingency plan.
(d) Federal, state, and local permits and licenses that are anticipated to be required.
(e) Provisions for financial assurance required under R 425.301.
(f) Other terms and conditions of the mining permit.
(2) A permittee may submit a request to the department to amend a mining permit.
(3) The department may require a permittee to submit an application for amendment of a mining permit if the department determines that the terms and conditions of the mining permit are not providing the intended reasonable protection of the environment, natural resources, or public health and safety.
(4) Within 30 days after receiving a request to amend a mining permit, the department shall determine whether the request constitutes a significant change from the conditions of the approved mining permit. If the department determines that the request is a significant change, then the department shall submit the request for amendment to the same review process as provided for a new permit application in R 425.211(4).

Under this rule, an amendment to the current permit is necessary in order for the work Alger Delta plans to be legal under Part 632. It is our opinion that Alger Delta would be working as an agent to KEMC and therefore, may be responsible for violations of this law.

At this time, we urge Alger Delta to rethink their planned work to the upgrade and extension of services for Kennecott Minerals until the following conditions are met: 1) the mining permit is final, (2) the conditions of the state lease are met allowing KEMC to begin working on the mine and (3) Kennecott addresses the necessity of amending their mining permit. Until these conditions are all accomplished, any work performed by Alger Delta to extend existing service or to install new service on CR 550, CR 510 and the CR AAA roads to service Kennecott Minerals – will be in direct violation of the Part 632 statute and rules.

If you would like to discuss further, please contact me at 906 360-2414.

Sincerely,

Cynthia Pryor
Executive Director
Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve, Inc
P.O. Box 5, Big Bay, MI 49808

cc: Mr. Jon Cherry – Kennecott Eagle Minerals Company
Mr. Stephen Chester – MI Department of Environmental Quality
Ms. Rebecca Humphries – MI Department of Natural Resources
Ms. Michelle Halley – National Wildlife Federation
Ms. Susan LaFernier – Keweenaw Bay Indian Community
Mr. Peter Dykema – Huron Mountain Club

Public Hearing on County’s “Hazard Mitigation Plan”

The Marquette County Planning Commission will hold a public meeting on June 4th, 2008. According to planner, Eric Anderson, “This hearing is part of the process to incorporate the Hazard Mitigation Plan into the County’s comprehensive plan. In addition, we will be encouraging cities and townships in Marquette County to adopt the plan.

The Plan has many flaws, including noting the sensitive nature of the Yellow Dog Plains regarding ground subsidence and erosion yet not listing Kennecott’s Eagle Project as a potential hazard to the area. The Plan does, however, consider opponents of the project to be a hazard.

Please read the full Plan at the Planning Department’s website.

Click HERE for an article critical of the Plan.

Location: commission chambers, second floor of the Henry Skewis Annex of the Marquette County Courthouse complex
Date and time: Wednesday, June 04 2008, 7:00pm – 8:00pm

Lansing hearings put U.P. wilderness on trial

Written by LAWRENCE COSENTINO
Wednesday, 21 May 2008

On the morning of April 28, a roomful of lawyers in the basement of Lansing’s vast Constitution Hall blinked at slides of a snow-covered cabin next to a woodland stream and beaver pond.

Rico Torreano, a burly corrections officer at Marquette Branch Prison in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, took the witness stand to open an epic sequence of hearings on the proposed Eagle Mine, set to dig in about 25 miles west of Marquette and a mile away from his home.

Read more >

Hearings Continue in Lansing

MARQUETTE — After today’s three scheduled environmental witnesses, testimony in a downstate contested case hearing is expected to shift to witnesses for the Kennecott Eagle Minerals Company and the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality.
The hearing, which is entering its third week of testimony in Lansing, is considering a challenge to a DEQ decision to grant Kennecott permits for its nickel and copper mine in northern Marquette County.
The National Wildlife Federation, Huron Mountain Club, Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve and Keweenaw Bay Indian Community are challenging the DEQ issuance of those mining and groundwater permits.
“At the conclusion of week two, we feel very confident about our case,” said Michelle Halley, an attorney with the National Wildlife Federation. “We’ve demonstrated that there will be a lot of pollutants that Kennecott has not considered and they will spread beyond the boundaries predicted by Kennecott.”
Friday’s testimony concluded with Mac Strand, a stream ecologist. Strand testified about the potential impacts to stream ecosystems, including fish and insects.
“Dr. Strand testified about potential impacts to the whole aquatic system of the Salmon Trout River,” Halley said. “He said the Yellow Dog River would be in a vulnerable position as well.”
Jon Cherry, general manager of the Eagle Project, said since the inception of the proposed mining project, “Kennecott has prepared for the building, operation and reclamation of the mine using the highest standards and most advanced technologies available for mineral resource development in the world today.”
“In seeking permits from the state of Michigan for the Eagle project, Kennecott demonstrated that the proposed design met or exceeded stringent standards established in the new state law and regulations,” Cherry said.
Witnesses scheduled to testify today for the plaintiffs include Glen Miller, who will discuss the purported inability of the mine’s proposed wastewater treatment plant to handle the quality or quantity of water going into it.
Miller will be followed by Alex Lindsay who will address the impact on birds and Dr. John Ejnik, an environmental chemist.
One final witness for the plaintiffs is expected to testify Wednesday because of a scheduling conflict. John Coleman will take the stand. His expertise is stormwater management.
The contested case hearing is expected to take another two weeks to complete. Administrative Law Judge Richard A. Patterson is presiding.

John Pepin      Marquette Mining Journal

Geologist testifies in lansing

    The contested case hearing challenging permits for a Kennecott Eagle Minerals Company mine in northern Marquette County was scheduled to continue today with testimony from a structural geologist.
The National Wildlife Federation, Huron Mountain Club, Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve and Keweenaw Bay Indian Community are challenging the issuance of mining and groundwater permits by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality to Kennecott for its nickel and copper mine.
On Wednesday, Jack Parker and Marsha Bjornerud testified. Parker specializes in practical rock mechanics and Bjornerud is a structural geologist. Bjornerud is expected to conclude her testimony today.
“Both witnesses focused on how Kennecott failed to adequately characterize rock strength and whether the crown pillar will fail,” said Michelle Halley, an attorney for the National Wildlife Federation.
After Bjornerud, petitioners expect Wilson Blake, a DEQ subsidence reviewer, Stan Vitton, another specialist in geology and rock mechanics, will testify.
After the petitioner witnesses are finished testifying, witnesses for Kennecott and the DEQ will be called to the stand.
The hearing is important because Kennecott cannot begin work on the Eagle Project until the contested case is settled.

John Pepin, Marquette Mining Journal

Congress considers restoring safeguards on nation’s streams and wetlands

Congress considers restoring safeguards on nation’s streams and wetlands

by Eric Kroh
Apr 24, 2008

WASHINGTON – Strong bipartisan support could restore federal environmental protection for small streams and wetlands that supply some water to more than 1.6 million people in Illinois alone.

The Clean Water Restoration Act is being examined by House and Senate committees but, though the bill has support from both sides of the aisle, similar bills have died in previous sessions of congress.

The bill would return the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act to where it was before the Supreme Court restricted it in decisions over the past several years. One case involved water in a gravel pit in northern Cook County that had become a wildlife habitat.

Support for the restoration act on Capitol Hill includes 175 co-sponsors of the bill, introduced in the House by James Oberstar, a Republican from Minnesota. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, spoke in support of the bill during a recent hearing.

”With an ever-expanding population and the potentially devastating impacts of global warming on our water supply, now is not the time to be weakening the Clean Water Act,” Boxer said.

Click here for the rest of the story

Story URL: http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/news.aspx?id=87155
Story Retrieval Date: 4/29/2008 2:51:16 PM CST