China Hungry for Bigger Helping of Rio Tinto

Pass the Fish and Chips

China Hungry for Bigger Helping of Rio Tinto

By Gabriel Caplett

London-based Rio Tinto’s CEO Tom Albanese may have to bone up on his Mandarin if emergency talks with the Chinese government-owned aluminum giant, Chinalco, produce an expected US $8 to $9 billion in asset sales. The deal would give China 15% ownership in the company and allow continued access to base metals, such as iron ore, primarily used to make steel, an essential ingredient allowing the country to expand its infrastructure. According to the London Guardian, the deal would “further reflect the shift in power between recession-struck developed countries and faster-growing Asian economies.”

China is already Rio Tinto’s largest shareholder, having purchased a roughly 9% stake in the company early in 2008, amid concerns over losing future bargaining power in iron ore pricing negotiations if the world’s largest mining company, BHP-Billiton, were to purchase Rio Tinto. Throughout BHP’s failed $142 billion takeover bid, Chinalco denied reports that it would pursue a larger stake in Rio Tinto.

The current talks are seen as a last ditch effort before debt-laden Rio Tinto is forced to begin raising cash by issuing new shares and requesting current shareholders to invest further in the company. Last week, Rio Tinto was able to offload its Brazilian iron ore and Argentine potash assets to the Vale Mining company for $1.6 billion. In December, Rio Tinto announced that it would layoff at least 14,000 workers, worldwide, due to decreasing global demand for most metals. The company has already scaled-back its plans for major expansions in Africa, South America and Australia.

Until recently, Rio Tinto’s value was skyrocketing due to increased demand from developing nations China and India. According to Rio Tinto China’s Managing Director, Anthony Loo, from 2000 to 2006 the company’s sales to China increased nearly 10-fold.

The US has continued to follow this trend by providing the world economy, not with manufactured products, but raw materials, such as grains, iron ore and timber. The result has been that the US sells China its steel, nickel, copper, palladium and other metals and China, in turn, builds infrastructure and its military while exporting a higher-value manufactured product back to the US, creating an enormous trade deficit with China.

The Lake Superior region is seen as a potential major source of raw material to growing overseas economies. Don Fosnacht, director for the Center for Applied Research and Technology Development at the Natural Resources Research Institute said, “There are real opportunities for Minnesota to be a supplier of raw materials to China in both the ferrous and nonferrous areas.”

While the situation has proven profitable, at least in the short-term, for mining companies and their shareholders, the effects on working class Americans has been devastating.

From 1989 to 2003, at least 1.5 million US jobs were displaced due to the growing trade deficit with China, with the pace of job loss more than doubling following China’s entry into the World Trade Organization, in 2001. The State of Michigan was among the nation’s top ten losers. By 2005, long before the current global recession, the state lost at least 50,991 jobs as a direct result of this trade relationship. According to the American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition, Michigan has lost at least 315,000 manufacturing jobs, while dropping nearly 500,000 total jobs, since 2000.

The economic consequences can be dire. Due to the increasing mechanization of mining operations, workers are getting phased-out at the same time that metals production has increased dramatically. Even in the Iron Range counties of Minnesota, mining jobs now account for only 5% of total personal income. According to the US Department of Labor, this increased mechanization will be largely responsible for an estimated loss of 10,000 mining jobs by 2016.

Yet, in a proverbial yang to the workers’ yin, business may continue to grow, long-term, for China and Rio Tinto. In 2003, then-Chairman Robert Wilson said, “China’s growth, with its heavy emphasis on infrastructure development, has become a major influence in the market for many of our products…China’s consumption of metal has been growing by more than 10 percent annually and rapid growth seems likely to continue.”

In 2007, Rio Tinto’s chairman, Paul Skinner, noted, “Growth in China, which is critical to the demand outlook for many of our products, remains strong and well-balanced.”

According to the Michigan Economic Development Corporation, the only economic sectors that continue to grow, in the state, are in alternative energy, healthcare and information technology. Indeed, many economists are urging a transition from industrial, extractive-based economic systems, to sustainable models based upon clean water and land resources. A recent Michigan State University economic study shows that Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, alone, contributes at least $20 million, annually, to the local economy. A 2007 Brookings Institute and University of Michigan report has concluded that a $26 billion dollar investment in Great Lakes restoration would yield at least $50 billion in regional long-term economic benefits and an additional $30 billion to $50 billion in short-term economic activity.

Meanwhile, back in London, Rio Tinto CEO Albanese will likely continue looking to China in order to increase profits for his flock of shareholders. That is, if he stays with the company. Albanese is, reportedly, quite close to Rio Tinto’s chairman, Paul Skinner, who has been replaced by Jim Leng, from India’s Tata Steel, after losing the confidence of company shareholders following the extravagant $38 billion purchase of Alcan, in 2007, and collapse of the company in 2008. The Financial Times has reported that oil giant BP may not want Skinner either.

February 18: DEQ Hosts Public Meeting in Humbolt

Concerned citizens will get a chance on February 18 to voice their opinions on Kennecott’s plans to re-open the old Humboldt Mill at a public meeting hosted by Michigan’s Department of Environmental Quality

Kennecott Minerals bought the property last September with plans to process ore from its proposed Eagle Project. Without legal permits to develop Eagle, the company continues to push permits for this processing facility, which was not part of the original mine plan.

The Department of Environmental Quality would have to approve Kennecott’s application before the company could reopen the facility. The meeting schedule is as follows:

Location: Humboldt Township Hall

Directions: Hwy 41 to M95. M95 south, 1 block, turn west on County Road FA. Follow signs to the Hall. Click here for map to Humboldt Township Hall.

Time and Date: Wednesday, February 18

1:00 – 2:00 Informal Question and Answer

2:15 – 4:45 Formal Testimony

6:00 – 7:00 Informal Question and Answer

7:15 – ? Formal Testimony


February 10: Sulfide Mining Educational Forum To Be Held

Representatives from local organizations will hold an educational forum on Kennecott Mineral’s recent permit application to re-open the old Humboldt Ore Processing Facility in Humboldt Township near Republic, MI.  Contributing organizations include: National Wildlife Federation, Save the Wild UP, Northwoods Wilderness Recovery, Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve, and Students Against Sulfide Mining.

Concerned citizens are encouraged to attend this informational session for learning how to comment most effectively at the DEQ hearing and to clarify questions about Kennecott’s permit.

When: Tuesday, February 10, 2009; 6:00 pm – 8:00 pm followed by a screening of the National Wildlife Federation documentary, “Mining Madness, Water Wars: The Great Lakes in the Balance
Where: Charcoal Room, Northern Michigan University Center

For more information, call Save the Wild UP at 906-228-4444

1872 Mining Reform Bill

Congress takes another stab at mining reform

7:45 a.m. January 29, 2009

— A mining reform bill similar to one that passed the U.S. House last year but failed to get out of the Senate has been reintroduced in the House.

In addition to rewriting the Mining Law of 1872, the measure would impose royalties on the hard-rock mining industry.

“Given our current economic crisis and the empty state of our national treasury, it is ludicrous to be allowing this outmoded law to continue to exempt these lucrative mining activities from paying a fair return to the American people,” said Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., the chairman of the House Resource Committee who introduced the bill on Tuesday.

Please click here to read the entire article

Rio Tinto’s Train Derailment

What if this was metallic sulfide ore?

Iron ore train derailment could cost $10 million

In Western Australia’s Pilbara, one of Rio Tinto’s massive iron ore trains has been derailed, spilling thousands of tonnes of iron ore.

The incident happened on Thursday night, no-one was injured and rail safety investigators have visited the scene.

It’s understood the train was on the Hammersley Line on its way to Dampier Port when more than 80 wagons came off the rails near a junction point, 80 kilometres north of Tom Price.

The damage bill is estimated at up to $10 million.

ABC rural reporter Laurissa Smith flew to the scene of the derailment.

She says 800 metres of track has been torn up, and it’s estimated it’ll take five days to clear the line.

“If you can imagine a big train domino effect, there’s just piles of these ore cars stacked on one another and the iron ore has slipped out all over the track and onto parts of the road, and it’s certainly a spectacular sight.”

Click here to read the entire article

Wiggle Worm: How Kennecott Got Off-the-Hook

Marquette County, Michigan – New information has surfaced suggesting that the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) assisted Kennecott-Rio Tinto by forgoing proper procedure in allowing the company to reconstruct a road crossing in Fall of 2004. With Kennecott’s persistence, the DEQ approved an ill-designed plan to install a new culvert on the Triple A Road where a branch of the Salmon Trout River flows. Kennecott was contracting with Pete O’Dovero, of Associated Contractors, to rehabilitate the road crossing.

Read the Entire Article by Gabriel Caplett at Northwoodswild.org

Canada’s toxic mine tailings secret goes to court: Information on toxic pollution from mines being hidden from public

TORONTO – Canada’s Federal Court heard a lawsuit case on Monday against the Minister of the Environment for failing to ensure that Canada’s mining industry publicly reports the hundreds of millions of kilograms of toxic pollution it generates each year.

The lawsuit was filed in Federal Court in late 2007 by Ecojustice (formerly Sierra Legal Defense Fund) on behalf of Mining Watch Canada and Great Lakes United. The Application for Judicial review alleges that the Minister broke the law when he directed mining companies to not report huge amounts of pollution sent to tailings ponds and waste rock piles to the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI).

“We are arguing that the Minister has ignored his legal duties under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act to provide the public with the full extent of pollutants released by mining companies in Canada,” said Justin Duncan, Staff Lawyer with Ecojustice. “The Canadian public – and especially residents living downstream from mining operations – have the right to scrutinize the environmental and health hazards these mining companies continue to create”

In stark contrast, for more than a decade the U.S. government has required mining companies to report the amount of pollutants they release under the American equivalent of the NPRI, the U.S. Toxics Release Inventory (TRI).

In 2005, in the United States, mining operations represented less than one-half a percent of all industries reporting to the TRI; however, they accounted for 27% of all pollutants released – more than 530 million kilograms of toxic materials.

Pollution in the form of mine tailings and waste rock – the data being withheld from the Canadian public – accounted for more than 97% of the total pollutants reported by the U.S. mining industry.

“Given the enormous amounts of carcinogens and heavy metals like lead and mercury reported in U.S. mine tailings, it is absurd that Canadian mines are being let off the hook and not reporting this massive form of toxic pollution,” said MiningWatch Canada spokesman Jamie Kneen. “Whether you live in Smithers, British Columbia, Voisey’s Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador, or anywhere in between, Canadians have a right to know what poisons industry is releasing into our air, water, and soil.”

“There are at least 80 facilities across the country not reporting their tailings and waste rock pollution to the NPRI. If the U.S. figures are any indication, this could be many millions of kilograms of toxic pollution,” said John Jackson, Director of Clean Production and Toxics for Great Lakes United. “But, so long as the Minister of the Environment continues to direct the mining industry to break the law and conceal these figures, we’ll never know.”

For further information please visit www.ecojustce.ca or contact:

Justin Duncan or Marlene Cashin, Ecojustice (416) 368-7533 ext.22 or ext. 31 John Jackson, Great Lakes United, (519) 744-7503 or 519-591-7503 (cell) Jamie Kneen, MiningWatch Canada (613) 569-3439

Do Your Homework: Learn About Uranium Mining

Uranium Fact Sheets on the Web

May 24, 2008

Compiled by

Paul Robinson

Southwest Research and Information Center

sricpaul@earthlink.net

I. Uranium Fact Sheet

http://www.ieer.org/fctsheet/uranium.html

Institute for Energy and Environmental Research – “Uranium: Its Uses and Hazards”

II. Laguna Pueblo Uranium Curriculum

http://www.miningwatch.ca/index.php?/Uranium/Laguna_curriculum

Uranium Mining and its Impact on Laguna Pueblo: A Study Guide for an Interdisciplinary Unit,

July 21, 1998

III. Uranium Overviews from Wise Uranium Project

http://www.wise-uranium.org/uwai.html

Uranium Mining and Milling Wastes: An Introduction, by Peter Diehl

Contents

URANIUM MINES

WASTE ROCK

HEAP LEACHING

IN SITU LEACHING

MILLING OF THE ORE

URANIUM MILL TAILINGS DEPOSITS

Characteristics of uranium mill tailings

Potential hazards from uranium mill tailings

Concepts for tailings disposal

Standards for uranium mill tailings management

Reclamation of uranium mill tailings deposits

DISPOSAL OF OTHER MATERIALS

http://www.wise-uranium.org/stk.html?src=stkd01e

WISE Uranium Project – Slide Talk: Uranium Mining and Milling

Uranium mining and milling basics

Environmental impacts

Health hazards for miners and residents

Uranium mill tailings hazards and reclamation

Tailings dam stability

www.wise-uranium.org includes pages for uranium sites around the world among other material.

IV. Environmental Protection Agency Uranium Fact Sheet

http://www.epa.gov/radiation/radionuclides/uranium.htm

URANIUM

The Basics

Who discovered uranium?

Where does uranium come from?

What are the properties of uranium?

What is uranium used for?

Exposure to Uranium

How does uranium get into the environment?

How does uranium change in the environment?

How are people exposed to uranium?

How does uranium get into the body?

What does uranium do once it gets into the body?

Health Effects of Uranium

How can uranium affect people’s health?

Is there a medical test to determine exposure to uranium?

Protecting People From Uranium

How do I know if I’m near uranium?

What can I do to protect myself and my family from uranium?

What is EPA doing about uranium?

V. Uranium Mining documents from USEPA Technology Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials

Uranium Mining Wastes page – http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/tenorm/uranium.html

Includes TENORM from Uranium Mining Reports

In 2008, EPA updated and re-released a two-volume technical report on uranium mining TENORM wastes, Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials from Uranium Mining, Volumes 1 and 2:

Volume 1; Mining and Reclamation Background provides background information on the occurrence,

mining, and reclamation of uranium mines – http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/tenorm/pubs.html#402-r-08-005

Volume 2: Investigation of Potential Health, Geographic, and Environmental Issues of Abandoned Uranium Mines provides a general scoping evaluation of potential radiogenic cancer and environmental risks posed by abandoned uranium mines – http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/tenorm/pubs.html#402-r-08-005ii

VI. Uranium and Radium Human Health Fact Sheets – 2 pages

http://www.ead.anl.gov/pub/doc/Uranium.pdf and

http://www.ead.anl.gov/pub/doc/Radium.pdf

Uranium Human Health Fact Sheet? Radium Human Health Fact Sheet – Argonne National Laboratories

Contents

What is it?

Where does it come from?

How is it used?

What’s in the Environment?

What Happens to It in the Body?

What Are the Primary Health Effects?

What Is the Risk?

VII. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATDR) – as 2 page fact sheets as well as detailed Public Health Statement and voluminous Toxicological Profile for a wide range of metals and radionulides.

Two page ToxFAQs fact sheets related to potential hazards at uranium mines and mills include:

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts145.htmlhttp://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts145.pdf – Radon

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts150.htmlhttp://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts150.pdf – Uranium

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts144.htmlhttp://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts144.pdf – Radium

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts5.htmlhttp://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts5.pdf – Cadmium

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts13.htmlhttp://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts13.pdf – Lead

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts2.htmlhttp://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts2.pdf – Arsenic

TOXFAQs all use a similar outline, such as:

What is radon?

What happens to radon when it enters the environment?

How might I be exposed to radon?

How can radon affect my health?

How likely is radon to cause cancer?

Is there a medical test to show whether I’ve been exposed to radon?

Has the federal government made recommendations to protect human health?

Glossary, References, and Contact Information

ATSDR Public Health Statements and toxicological profiles for Radon are at:

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp145.html#bookmark05 ATSDR Full Toxicological Profile on Radon

VIII. Selected Uranium Related-materials on the Southwest Research and Information Center Web Site: Additional materials available related to renewable energy, nuclear safety, mining and waste management and community development.

http://www.sric.org

Uranium Overview:

http://www.sric.org/uranium/upresentation/4-1.html

Uranium Health and Environmental Research in Diné Communities

Brief History of Uranium Development in Diné communities

Basics of Radiation Health Issues

Sources

Pathways of Exposure

Review of Uranium Health Studies
– workers, general population, livestock, environment

Case Study — Outdoor Radon in Church Rock

Implications for Navajo Communities

Educational Programs

Resources for Information

http://www.sric.org/uranium/1979-SRIC-URANIUM%20MINING%20AND%20MILLING%20PRIMER.pdf

Southwest Research and Information Center – Uranium Mining and Milling: A Primer

Uranium developments in Southwest US – AZ and NM; Mt. Taylor Traditional Cultural Property Petition, Uranium and the 1872 Mining Law

http://www.sric.org/1872/index.html

Navajo Nation Legislation

http://www.sric.org/uranium/DNRPA.pdf

Dine Natural Resources Protection Act of 2005

From the SRIC Newsletter Voices From The Earth:

http://www.sric.org/voices/2006/v7n4/index.html

CONTINUING TARGETS: New Mexico and Navajo & Hopi lands

http://www.sric.org/voices/2006/v7n3/index.html

New Uranium Boom Threatens Communities

http://www.sric.org/voices/2006/v7n3/NewUBoom.html

The New U Boom: Speculation or Serious Development?

http://www.sric.org/voices/2006/v7n3/Need_Greed.html

Need or Greed? Uranium Prices and Demand

http://www.sric.org/voices/2004/v5n4/uspotprice.html

Uranium Price Rise…Still No Need for New Mines

http://www.sric.org/voices/2004/v5n3/index.html

Uranium…the problems continue

http://www.sric.org/voices/2004/v5n3/UMTRCA.html

Reclaiming the Land: History of Uranium Mill Tailings Clean-up – full report listed below

Environmental Justice Principles

http://www.sric.org/voices/2003/v4n1/principles.html

http://www.sric.org/U_Mill_Tailing_Remediation_05182004.pdf

Uranium Mill Tailings Remediation Performed by the US DOE: An Overview

Table of Contents – brief introductory “fact sheet-like” sections in bold italics

Acknowledgements

Summary

Introduction

UMTRAP and Uranium Mill Tailings Information Sources on the Internet

Characteristics of Uranium Mill Tailings and the Hazardous Materials They Contain

UMTRAP Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Before and After Remediation

DOE’s UMTRAP Project is a Unique and Significant Example of a Complete Radioactive Waste Management Program

Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) and Associated Implementing Regulations

Summary of UMTRAP Performance After 25 Years of Effort

Ground Water Remediation and UMTRAP

Cost of UMTRAP Uranium Mill Tailings Remediation

Projected Cost of Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance at UMTRAP Sites

DOE Policy Developments Related to Uranium Mill Tailings Since 2000

Reference

Appendix A – Tables and Figures

Appendix B – Photographs of UMTRAP Sites

Appendix C – Summary of NRC Criteria Adopted to Implement the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act

IX. Radiation Exposure Compensation Act/Uranium Worker Compensation Program

http://www.bu.edu/formerworker/RECP_Factsheet.pdf

Radiation Exposure Compensation Program

http://www.recalaw.com/index.htm

In 1990, the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) was signed into law by President George Bush. The law established one time payments of $100,000.00 to uranium miners who suffered a compensable disease. On July 10, 2000, President Clinton signed the RECAA amendments that expanded the program to include uranium millers and ore transporters. Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA) of 2000 also included an additional $50,000.00 and medical benefits for uranium workers approved under RECA.

If you or a deceased relative of yours worked in the uranium industry between 1942 and 1971, you may be eligible for benefits under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act.

http://www.recalaw.com/faq.htm

Radiation Exposure Compensation Act: Frequently Asked Questions

X. Uranium Market

http://www.infomine.com/commodities/uranium.asp

Uranium Market Home page – INFOMINE

http://www.goldletterint.com/egr/egr_uranium.pdf

Uraniumletter International – “Uranium Price Remains on the Move,” July, 2006 – 20 pp.

XI.News Reports

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-navajo-series,0,4515615.special

“Blighted Homeland” – Four-part series on uranium problems in Navajo Country

Southwest Research and Information Center News Links Focussed on Uranium

http://www.sric.org/news/index.html

See Community-Oriented Uranium Information Sites

XII. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) – Uranium Licensing Overviews

http://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/idmws/ViewDocByAccession.asp?AccessionNumber=ML070460009

Includes:

02/08/07 NRC Licensing Process Presentation by Stephen Cohen.

2/08/07 NEPA Process Presentation by J. Park.

02/08/07 Underground Injection Control Program Presentation by M. Ginsberg, EPA.

Materials from NRC-National Mining Association April- May 2008 meeting

http://www.uraniumwatch.org/nrc_nma_workshop.2008.htm

Updates and NRC posting anticipated by June 1, 2008

XIII. Community-Oriented Uranium Information Sites

WISE Uranium Project

www.wise-uranium.org

Uraniumwatch

www.uraniumwatch.org

Miningwatch Canada

www.miningwatch.ca

Western Mining Action Network

www.wman-info.org

Indigenous Environmental Network

www.ienearth.org

XIV. Uranium Policy Statements and Resolutions

All Indian Pueblo Council and Navajo Nation Resolutions

http://www.uraniumwatch.org/envjustice.htm

XV. Atomic Posters

http://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/Atomicposters/atomicmovieposters.htm

Movie Posters

http://www.printsandprintmaking.gov.au/Catalogues/Works/tabid/57/frmView/Record/itemID/56672/Default.aspx

Anti-Uranium Poster, 1978 (Spanish)