Support the U.P. Grassroots Campaign to Defend Our Water and Stop the Eagle Mine

Campaign kick-off: JULY 9!!!

Dear Save the Wild UP supporter,

We are writing to ask you to join and support a new campaign that SWUP (Save the Wild UP) with its partner, WAVE (Water Action Vital Earth), is organizing to halt development of the Kennecott Eagle Mine.  It is called the UP Grassroots Campaign to Defend Our Water and Stop the Eagle Mine. It may well be our last best chance to do so.

The campaign is a joint venture of SWUP and WAVE.  SWUP’s role will be largely administrative, and educational.  It will serve as a clearing house for information about the campaign.  WAVE, a new organization you may not be familiar with, is a collective, formed by members of the coalition opposed to sulfide mining.  It will serve as the political arm of the campaign.  It will be responsible for taking actions needed to accomplish the campaign’s goal and objectives.

We will fast, vigil, pray, do walks and consider other nonviolent means of expressing our distress at the continued development of the mine.  We will support activities at Eagle Rock organized by members of the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community and other tribes.  And we will use the campaign as an opportunity to consider how we will resist new mining projects in the sulfide ore rich western U.P. that Rio Tinto and other mining companies are planning.

The campaign is urgently required.  Kennecott has indicated that it may begin underground construction of the mine as early as mid-September.   It presently plans to blast the mine’s portal directly through Eagle Rock, a sacred site of the Annishinabe people.  It has also become a symbol for all of us of the sacredness our precious, fragile ecosystem.


Please read the attached letter and respond as you feel appropriate2011 0618 FINAL Letter Final with LOGOS

 

Donations are made easy online via PayPal by clicking the DONATE button on the front page.

 

Make as generous a donation as you can to support this new, all out effort to stop the Eagle Mine.  Thank you.

 

Sincerely,

 

Gail Griffith, President, SWUP

 

Catherine Parker, WAVE Spokesperson

 

 

 

 

Penokee Hills Education Project Formed

For Immediate Release June 20, 2011

Contact: Frank K. Koehn:

218.341.8822 (C) 715.682.0635 (O)  715.774.3333 (H)

penokeehillseducationproject@gmail.com

Ashland WI – Citizens from Ashland, Bayfield and Iron Counties concerned about mining developments have formed the Penokee Hills Education Project (PHEP).  PHEP has organized to address the fast-track proposal to begin iron ore (taconite) mining in Northern Wisconsin’s Penokee Hills and Bad River watershed. The Penokee Hills and the Bad River watershed, located in Ashland and Iron Counties, have been targeted for iron ore (taconite) by a subsidiary of Florida-based Cline Group.

Continue reading

Minnesota: June 22nd is Sulfide Mining Awareness Day

Canoe Wild RiceWaterLegacy is collaborating with Friends of the Boundary Waters to promote Sulfide Mining Awareness Day on June 22. 

Talk with your friends, family, and neighbors about the dangers of sulfide mining and help them send a comment on the Hardrock Draft EIS if they haven’t already.

Help make sure our prized northern Minnesota lake district and Lake Superior are protected from toxic pollution and noise caused by prospecting and sulfide mining.

Check WaterLegacy.org or Friends-Bwca.org soon for more details!

Nickel plunging into bear market on biggest glut in 4 years

RIO TINTO’s bad investment in a nickel mine, but Michiganders have the most to loose if the Eagle Mine is built.

Bloomberg News  Jun 13, 2011 – 9:43 AM ET

By Agnieszka Troszkiewicz and Maria Kolesnikova

At a time of scarcity in everything from crude oil to copper to corn, nickel is heading for the biggest glut in four years, driving prices lower into 2012.

Next year’s surplus will rise to 60,000 metric tonnes from 12,000 tonnes in 2011, making nickel the most oversupplied metal relative to output or use, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch, the most-accurate forecaster tracked by Bloomberg over two years. New mines will boost supply 11% in 2012, the most in 17 years, Macquarie Group Ltd. says. Prices may drop 12% to US$20,000 a ton by Dec. 31, the median estimate in a Bloomberg survey of 17 analysts and traders shows.

“I’m not particularly optimistic about nickel,” said Ian Henderson, who manages about US$10 billion of natural-resource assets at JPMorgan Chase & Co. in London, including the Global Natural Resources Fund, which doubled in two years. “I don’t think there is a commercial logic for the price where it is today. A nickel price of US$15,000 is entirely possible.”

While raw-material producers are failing to extract enough copper and oil and droughts threaten crops, nickel supply is expanding faster than demand. Prices reached a record US$51,800 in 2007 and moved at least 63% a year since then, leading consumers to use more substitutes than in any other major commodity, Macquarie says. Ikea Group, the world’s largest home- furnishings retailer, is removing the metal from kitchen and bathroom products.

Used mostly in stainless steel, nickel fell 8.5% to US$22,648 this year by 6:56 a.m. on the London Metal Exchange, making it the third-worst performer after raw sugar and zinc on the Standard & Poor’s GSCI index of 24 commodities, which advanced 11%. The MSCI All-Country World Index of equities is little changed and Treasuries returned 3.1%, a Bank of America Merrill Lynch index shows.

Construction and transport account for 37% of nickel demand, with another 18% used in machinery and electrical applications, according to UBS AG. Consumption of 1.51 million tons in 2010 was worth US$33 billion at last year’s average price.

Declining prices mean profit at OAO GMK Norilsk Nickel, the world’s biggest producer, will probably be little changed this year, Chief Executive Officer Vladimir Strzhalkovsky said in an interview June 8. Nickel accounted for about 43% of the Moscow-based company’s 2009 sales.

“If there is a glitch in the global economy, demand for industrial metals will go down,” he said. “It’s dangerous to depend on nickel.”

Winning Streak

The bear market ends a two-year winning streak when prices more than doubled. As demand rebounded from the worst global recession since World War II, supply was curbed by strikes of a year or more at Vale SA’s Sudbury and Voisey’s Bay mines in Canada. The disputes have ended and the Rio De Janeiro-based company predicts a 56% production gain this year.

Lower prices may force higher-cost smelters to curb or halt output, limiting declines. China is the world’s biggest nickel producer. The nation’s least-efficient makers of nickel pig iron, a cheaper alternative to refined nickel, need about US$20,000 a ton to break even, according to Societe Generale SA. Reduced demand from stainless steelmakers and rising energy costs make it more likely that privately owned smelters will shut in the second half of 2011, the bank said in a report.

Chinese imports of nickel ore rose 29% in March from a year earlier and 33% in April, spurring analysts to anticipate a similar increase in the country’s production. Those assumptions could be wrong because the ore may be of a lower grade, reducing the amount of metal that can be extracted and curbing the pace of production growth, Societe Generale said in a report June 3.

Mining costs are surging. The cost of everything from wages to energy to changes in exchange rates rose a combined 25% in Canada, 18% in Australia and 12% in Russia last year, according to UBS.

Prices were partly supported this year by a 17% decline in stockpiles monitored by the LME. With Barclays Capital predicting that the market will move into a supply surplus in the third quarter, that trend in inventory may reverse.

The surplus in aluminum will narrow to 301,000 tons this year, from 609,000 tons in 2010, Bank of America Merrill Lynch estimates. Prices for the metal used in aircraft and cars rose 6% this year on the LME. The glut in zinc will drop to 11,000 tons from 675,000 tons, the bank forecasts. Zinc retreated 8.1% in London since the start of January.

Production of copper will fall 380,000 tons short of demand in 2011, compared with a 108,000-ton deficit in 2010, Bank of America Merrill Lynch says. Prices declined 6.9% this year. Lead, which declined 0.2% since Dec. 31, is moving into a shortfall of 61,000 tons from a surplus of 35,000 tons, the bank predicts. Supply of tin, which fell 5.8% this year, will be 12,000 tons less than demand, the same amount as in 2012, Barclays Capital estimates.

The oil market is using inventory and the spare production capacity of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries to meet consumption, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said in a report May 23. Both will eventually become exhausted, requiring higher prices to restrain demand, the bank said. New York-traded crude oil rose 8.7% this year.

In agriculture, Rabobank International expects supply deficits in corn, soybeans, wheat, coffee, cotton and cocoa in the 2010-2011 or 2011-12 seasons. The Standard & Poor’s GSCI Agriculture Index of eight commodities jumped 73% in the past 12 months.

Nickel supplies are increasing at a time when economic growth is showing signs of weakening. U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said June 7 the recovery remains “uneven” and “frustratingly slow,” three days after the Labor Department reported that employers added the fewest jobs in eight months.

German industrial production fell for the first time in four months in April, the Economy Ministry said June 8. A day earlier, the World Bank cut its 2011 global growth estimate to 3.2% from 3.3%.

While stainless-steel output rose 8.6% to 8.39 million tons in the first quarter, a record for the period, the International Stainless Steel Forum said last month that gains won’t be sustained through the year. The Brussels-based group’s members account for about 75% of global output. Rising production may also mask a swing toward demand for steels containing less nickel or substitution with other materials.

Ikea, based in Stockholm, plans to almost eliminate nickel from its bathroom and kitchen products by August 2012, said Gaetano Ronchi, a senior manager at the company’s purchasing arm. Of the 80,000 tons of stainless steel it uses annually, 88% is now nickel-free, he said.

With nickel accounting for at least half the cost of 300- series stainless steel, the most common type, the retailer is not alone in seeking alternatives. The steel’s market share fell to 56% last year from 72% in 2000, Macquarie estimates.

Nickel demand now is about 20% lower than it would have been if prices hadn’t jumped more than fourfold to the 2007 record in the space of 18 months, according to Jim Lennon, the head of commodities research at Macquarie in London who has been following the market for three decades.

The switch from nickel-bearing stainless steels means less potential to absorb additional supply. Vale will start the furnace at its Copper Cliff plant in Sudbury in June after four months of repairs. Xstrata Plc, based in Zug, Switzerland, reopened its Falcondo plant in the Dominican Republic in the first quarter, having shut it in 2008.

Norilsk resumed production at its Lake Johnston mine in Australia last week, after halting operations in 2009 because of costs. While the company forecasts a 5.9% increase in output this year, it wants to decrease its reliance on nickel in favor of copper, iron ore and coal.

Pacific Metals Co., based in Tokyo, Japan’s largest ferronickel producer, plans to open its Hachinohe plant in June after repairing damage caused by the country’s earthquake in March. Ferronickel contains about 38% nickel and is used by stainless-steel makers as a cheaper alternative to refined metal. New supply is also coming from projects in Brazil owned by Vale and London-based Anglo American Plc.

“Nickel probably has the most bearish outlook of all the metals,” said Michael Widmer, an analyst at Bank of America Merrill Lynch in London. “The thing that saved the market in the last two years was the strike at Vale. Someone will have to cut output, or delay projects.”

Mother Earth “Turtle Island” Water Walk 2011

Poster: WaterWalk11
Mother Earth Water Walkers are walking from four directions, across Turtle island, carrying four copper pails of four salt waters to Bad River, Wisconsin on the shores of Lake Superior, the very beginning place of the Walk that started it all.
Updated schedule:
June 4,5:  Seney
June 6,7:  Harvey
June 7,8:  Champion
Contact Info:  www.motherearthwaterwalk.com or waterwalk2011@gmail.com

 

Preserving the Great Lakes up to the people

Another opinion
May 29, 2011
The Traverse City Record-Eagle

The history of natural resources is simple. They vanish rapidly when they become commodities – even when they seem in unending supply.

In Michigan, it took less than a century in the 1800s to devastate fish populations of the Great Lakes, cut down primeval forests, shoot millions of passenger pigeons to extinction and annihilate sturgeon.

As millionaire Chicago fish dealer Alfred Booth said in 1885: “It did not take long for capital to see the rewards which might be gained by reaping the fields which Nature had so abundantly supplied with a crop that cost nothing for the sowing or raising, and but little for the reaping.”

Booth was talking about fish but his words apply to any abundant natural resource of the 1800s that was cut down or slaughtered and shipped off to far-away markets.

Fresh water from the Great Lakes apparently has become the region’s last “free” crop to extract, sell and export.

This is what the Great Lakes water fights of the last three decades really are about. It’s an important battle and will have great impact on the region’s future.

It is why governments, municipalities, elected leaders and individuals must become better stewards and more educated about the important role the Great Lakes, with 94,676 square miles of surface water, play in this region’s life, economy and natural world.

It is why fresh water must always be seen, protected and managed as a “public commons” by those who live around it – not international corporations and Wall Street.

Water is a vastly different natural resource than timber, wildlife, minerals and other natural resources. Humans, animals, plants and ecosystems cannot survive without it.

This is why fresh water, lakes, rivers, streams and navigable waters long have been protected by law and regulations for the common good.

To legally identify water from the Great Lakes as a “commodity” sets up a legal framework that would allow it to be siphoned off and sold for use outside the Great Lakes basin.

Current attempts to dismantle state and federal protection laws enacted in the 1960s and 1970s are an outrage given the history of these freshwater seas.

Traverse City has become a center for water advocacy, thanks to conservation lawyer Jim Olson and many Michigan residents. Olson was the attorney in the nine-year case of Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation vs. Nestle Waters of North America in Mecosta County.

He and other water activists who formed Flow for Water are vigilant sentinels for the Great Lakes and have done much to educate the public in annual conferences like “Saving the Great Lakes Forever,” held at the State Theatre and Northwestern Michigan College earlier this month.

“Too many people see the Great Lakes as a big dollar sign,” keynote speaker Maude Barlow said. “This way of looking at nature as a resource for us is failing the Earth.”

She’s right. The history of the Great Lakes’ natural resources proves that.

Sessions like this month’s conference – organized by Flow for Water, the Great Lakes Water Institute at NMC and Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation – keep water issues in public focus.

Without them, people might lose sight of what these great bodies of fresh water mean to Michigan, the United States and the world.

The lakes clearly need strong advocates, stewards and leaders at the grass-roots level all along their shores.

Recent water politics and court decisions show us that the federal and state governments, big business, and the Michigan Supreme Court have little interest in saving Great Lakes water.
© Copyright 2011 The Traverse City Record-Eagle. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

http://www.miningjournal.net/page/content.detail/id/562863/Preserving-the-Great-Lakes-up-to-the–people.html?nav=5003

What’s the rush on mine permitting?

By Al Gedicks

May 19, 2011  http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/122260424.html

Should the state’s regulatory authority over the metallic mine permitting process be dramatically reduced to accommodate the wishes of a mining company to receive a permit in record time? This is not a hypothetical question.

Gogebic Taconite (GTAC) has met with several legislators about its proposed open pit iron ore (taconite) mine along the border of Ashland and Iron counties to push legislation that would drastically speed up the mine permitting process.

The present review process, which was the result of hard-fought environmental battles in the 1970s, can take several years, depending on the complexity of the mine plan and the potential environmental impacts of the project. However, Sen. Rich Zipperer (R-Pewaukee) and state Rep. Mark Honadel (R-South Milwaukee) plan to propose legislation that would reduce the review to 300 days. GTAC President Bill Williams told a reporter that his company may abandon its plans for a $1.5 billion taconite mine and processing plant if the process takes too long.

Ever since a grass-roots Indian and environmental alliance defeated a proposal to build a metallic sulfide mine at Crandon, the international mining industry has considered the state among the least favorable places for mining investment.

In 1998, the state passed the Mining Moratorium Law, which requires that before the state can issue a permit for the mining of sulfide ore bodies, potential miners must provide an example of where a metallic sulfide mine in the United States or Canada has not polluted surface and groundwaters during or after mining. In 2003, the Sokaogon Chippewa and the Forest County Potawatomi tribes bought the Crandon mine property for $16.5 million and ended a 28-year conflict over the mine.

GTAC now wants to turn back the clock on environmental protection and respect for the rights of indigenous peoples. Gogebic Taconite is a limited liability company registered on the Toronto Stock Exchange and owned by the Cline Group, a coal mining company based in Florida. Christopher Cline is a billionaire who owns large coal reserves in Illinois and Northern Appalachia.

If GTAC has its way, local citizens and the Bad River Chippewa tribe, who will be most directly affected by the proposed mine, will have little opportunity to participate in a thorough review of the social, economic and environmental impacts of the project. What information might be disclosed during a mine permit review process that would be so threatening to GTAC?

Bad River Chippewa Chairman Mike Wiggins Jr. is concerned that this mine could discharge polluted water to the Bad River watershed and the tribe’s wild rice beds in the Kakagon Sloughs, a 16,000-acre complex of wetlands, woodlands and sand dune ecosystems that is one of the largest freshwater estuaries in the world.

Wild rice is a sacred plant for the Chippewa and is very sensitive to water contamination as well as fluctuations in water levels. Dewatering operations at the proposed mine could lower the water table around the mine. It was the effort to protect the Sokaogon Chippewa’s wild rice beds that propelled the Crandon mine conflict.

The proposed mine involves extracting taconite by removing about 650 feet of overburden and creating a narrow pit around 4 miles long, up to 900 feet deep and a quarter-mile wide. The overburden would be dumped in massive tailings piles along the northwest side of the Penokee-Gogebic Range and at the headwaters of the Bad River Watershed. These large tailings piles have the potential to generate acid rock drainage if sulfide minerals are present in the waste rock.

These issues need to be evaluated in a fair and open environmental review through which the public and the Lake Superior Chippewa bands have the opportunity to have full disclosure of the potential impacts of the project. Legislation that would reduce the review process to 300 days would severely limit full disclosure of these impacts and be in direct violation of both state environmental law and treaties with the Lake Superior Chippewa bands.

Zipperer has expressed his desire to have the legislation passed before the end of the current session on June 30. Why is this legislation being fast-tracked? If passed, this legislation will effectively exclude Wisconsin citizens and tribes from having a voice in one of the most far reaching environmental decisions facing northern Wisconsin communities.

Al Gedicks teaches sociology at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse and is author of “Resource Rebels: Native Challenges to Mining and Oil Corporations.”

Do the research

Daily Mining Gazette 5-19-11

To the editor:

Reading articles regarding Kennecott’s Eagle Mine, why doesn’t the news media produce editorials exposing Rio Tinto’s negative impacts to keep local residents informed of what would/could happen here?

Is the media neglecting information that validates Rio Tinto’s history (of) continued negative impacts upon environmental/eco-systems, human health, and safe labor practices?

Google Rio Tinto and do some research. The following sites will identify how Rio Tinto’s operations, including mining, have negatively impacted communities and created devastating environmental/eco-disasters that will negatively impact human health forever, with Rio Tinto simply walking away with the attitude, “We have the lawyers and monies to buy who/wherever.”

Review: “Rio Tinto expansion will make air even more toxic,” (Salt Lake City Tribune), then read Fred Fox’s letter to the editor of The Mining Journal, Marquette “Stop the suits,” (May 15, 2011); (lawsuit) Hagens Berman v. Rio Tinto, filed Sept. 8, 2000; U.S. District Court, California; “Paul Howes declares war on Rio Tinto,” labor practices; “Chinese court hears case against Rio Tinto workers,” Trade law violations/bribery; and, “Pressure on Rio Tinto Alaskan Pebble Mine,” (an) unwanted mine in Alaska.

This is just a minute number of sites that identify how arrogant, bullying, and corrupt Rio Tinto is.

In fact, from numerous articles you may even conclude Rio Tinto and/or its subsidiary companies and agents have bribed officials to violate trade, state/federal environmental laws and humanitarian rights for profits.

Thus, I ask, why did Representative Tom Casperson tell Richard Sloat, Iron River, “Take them to court,” Daily News (May 10, 2011), letter to editor, “Protecting our water” after Mr. Sloat alleged mining permit laws were broken, by state issuing authorities, regarding Kennecott’s new reverse osmosis water system which hasn’t been tested in any active working mining environment and would/could endanger our local residents’ health, our environment, and the Upper Peninsula’s drinking waters forever.

If individuals possibly broke laws, why aren’t our representatives demanding an investigation of these corporate corruption allegations rather than brushing them under the rug?

And why (aren’t) our representatives demanding our judicial system ferret out and prosecute everyone who has possibly broken any laws related to the Kennecott Eagle Project, especially those whose actions would/could jeopardize our environment and/or residents’ human health?

Last question: Who in state/federal government received campaign contributions or gratuities from, and has a hand in, Rio Tinto and/or a subsidiary company’s pocket?

RAY WICKSTROM

Gladstone

“New Warriors for the Earth” WEBSITE

http://newwarriorsforearth.wordpress.com/author/newwarriorsforearth/

From Jessica Koski:  2011 0501 Leadership needed

Oshikinawe-Ogichidaag Akiing ‘New Warriors for the Earth’ is an Anishinaabe-based non-profit organization dedicated to educating and empowering our communities to take positive action to protect Aki, Mother Earth. We are grounded and guided by our Anishinaabe heritage and culture.  Our mission is to raise awareness about mining and environmental injustices facing the Western Great Lakes region and Aki. Our initial purpose is to protect our abundant freshwater resources and traditional homelands located in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan from intrusive multinational mining corporations and hazardous sulfide and uranium mining.

Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/New-Warriors-for-the-Earth/127252830644821?ref=ts

“Saving the Great Lakes Forever” Conference kicks off May 6

To enlarge:   FLOW_legal_4-10-11

(Traverse City, MI) –People from around the entire Great Lake Basin will be gathering for the 2011 Conference “Saving the Great Lakes Forever” which kicks off on Friday, May 6, at 6:50 p.m. at the historic State Theater in downtown Traverse City.

Hosted by the Flow for Water Coalition, the Great Lakes Water Studies Institute at Northwestern Michigan College and Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation, the conference will focus on learning about the abuses and threats facing the Great Lakes.  The conference will also provide solutions to stop these threats and to protect the citizens, communities, local agriculture, and businesses who depend upon the waters of the Great Lakes Basin.

Friday night’s kick-off will feature a presentation by Maude Barlow, internationally recognized water advocate and former Senior Advisor to the President of the United Nations General Assembly.  Ms. Barlow is the author of 16 books.  Her address will offer a unique perspective on how each of us living within the Great Lakes Basin need to come together to protect the waters of the Great Lakes.

A screening of the award winning documentary “Tapped”, an unflinching look at the plastic bottled water industry, will follow Ms. Barlow’s presentation and the evening will conclude with an afterglow party in the “Dome” at the Park Place Hotel for networking, live music, and refreshments.

The conference continues on Saturday, May 7, at Milliken Auditorium and Scholar Hall on the campus of Northwestern Michigan College. Registration opens at 8:00 a.m.  Welcome and introductions begin at 8:45 a.m.

Wenonah Hauter, Executive Director of Food and Water Watch and one of the world’s leading experts on water, energy, food and the environment, will speak at 9:00 a.m.  Her address will be followed by breakout workshop sessions on a variety of water-related hot topics.  The event will conclude with an expert roundtable discussion:  Solutions for Saving the Waters of the Great Lakes Basin.

“We are incredibly excited to hold this conference here and to be able to have presentations from both Maude Barlow and Wenonah Hauter.  They will provide a dynamic wake-up call to everyone interested in protecting our Great Lakes,” said Traverse City attorney, Jim Olson, who also serves as Executive Director of the Flow for Water Coalition.

“We take our incredible natural beauty and abundance for granted, but there are very real threats facing the Great Lakes Basin.” Olson continued, “ If we don’t protect these majestic waters now, the Great Lakes could be lost for our future generations.  Our goal is to build deep citizen awareness and provide solutions to make sure that doesn’t happen.”

Tickets are $25 per person for the 2-day event or $40 for two.

Tickets can be purchased on-line at www.flowforwater.org.

Or you can register, purchase tickets or obtain additional information at Jilliebean Green at (231) 432-0103 or at flow@jilliebeangreen.com

Contact: Jim Olson

231-946-0044

olson@envlaw.com

Brian Beauchamp

231-946-6584

brian@mlui

Terry Swier

231-972-8856

tswier@centurytel.net