6 thoughts on “Legal/Legislative Category”

  1. Thanks to Save the Wild U.P. for this space. This is truly a terrific idea. Please, let us find some way to keep the avenues of information OUT & ABOUT!

    Pasted below is a news release I received from another discussion/news list. I think this approach will be shown to have continuing relevance (of course, along with preventing the need for this kind of legislation in the first place!)

    When Michigan was targeted for a “low-level” radioactive waste dump, we found even similar (but nowhere as near so sophisticated) discussion to be helpful.

    Thanks again.

    Henry

    ——-forward—–>>>>

    To:
    Subject: Fwd: [Stumps] Great Town of Halifax, Virginia, stands up to corporations, 20080211
    X-Attachments: c:\documents and settings\user 1\application data\qualcomm\eudora\attach\media release – Halifax ordinance passes.doc;

    FYI…

    Thanks,
    Henry

    – – – – – – – ——–forward——- – – – >>

    Subject: Town of Halifax, Virginia, stands up to corporations
    Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:57:44 -0500
    From: Shireen
    Virginia town is first in state to ban chemical and radioactive bodily trespass, strip corporations of “rights”

    Please see the attached media release.

    The Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund
    675 Mower Road
    Chambersburg, Pennsylvania 17202

    http://www.celdf.org

    MEDIA RELEASE

    February 11, 2008
    For Immediate Release

    Contact: Ben Price
    Projects Director
    717-243-6725

    Shireen Parsons
    Virginia Organizer
    540-449-9144

    Jack Dunavant
    Member, Halifax Town Council
    434-572-7333

    Virginia Town First in State to Ban Chemical and Radioactive Bodily Trespass, Strip Corporations of “Rights”
    Joins Growing List of Communities Recognizing
    Rights of Nature

    On February 7, 2008, the Town Council of Halifax, Virginia, voted unanimously to adopt an ordinance banning corporate chemical and radioactive bodily trespass. Enacted to confront concerns about the proposed uranium mine in adjacent Pittsylvania County, the ordinance establishes strict liability and burden-of-proof standards for culpable corporations and government entities that permit and facilitate corporate bodily trespass.

    The ordinance also strips corporations of constitutional protections within the town. The Town of Halifax thus becomes the 10th municipality in the nation to refuse to recognize corporate constitutional “rights,” and to prohibit corporate rights from being used to override the rights of human and natural communities.

    The ordinance adopted by the Halifax Town Council also recognizes the rights of natural communities and ecosystems to exist and flourish within the town and provides for the enforcement and defense of those rights, and prohibits corporations from interfering with the civil rights of residents, including residents’ right to self-government. The ordinance was drafted for the Halifax Town Council by the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund, a Pennsylvania-based nonprofit law firm.

    Ben Price, Projects Director for the Legal Defense Fund commented that “The people of the Town of Halifax have determined that they do not consent to be irradiated, nor to be trespassed upon, by toxic substances that would be released by Virginia Uranium, Inc., or any other state-chartered corporation. The people have asserted their right and their duty to protect their families, environment, and future generations. In enacting this law, the community has gone on record as rejecting the legal theory behind Dillon’s Rule, which erroneously asserts that there is no inherent right to local self-government. The American Revolution was about nothing less than the fundamental right of the people to be the decision-makers on issues directly affecting the communities in which they live. They understood that a central government, at some distance removed from those affected, acts beyond its authority in empowering a few powerful men –privileged with chartered immunities and rights superior to the people in the community – to deny citizens’ rights, impose harm, and refuse local self-determination. The people of the Town of Halifax have acted in the best tradition of liberty and freedom, and confronted injustice in the form of a state-permitted corporate assault against the consent of the sovereign people.”

    Shireen Parsons, the Legal Defense Fund’s Virginia Organizer, commended the action of the Halifax Town Council, stating that, “The council members demonstrated courage and solidarity in their commitment to justice and their duty to govern in the interest of protecting and preserving the health, safety and wellbeing of the people from whom they derive their power. This is the beginning of something wonderful in Virginia.”

    Halifax Town Council member Jack Dunavant said of the decision, “This is an historic vote. We, the people, intend to protect our health and environment from corporate assault. It’s time to invoke the Constitution and acknowledge the power of the people to protect our own destiny and end this era of corporate greed and pollution.”

    The Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund, located in Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, has worked with communities resisting corporate assaults upon democratic self-governance since 1995. Among other programs, it has brought its unique Daniel Pennock Democracy Schools to communities in 26 states in which people seek to end destructive and rights-denying corporate acts routinely permitted by state and federal agencies. In Pennsylvania alone, more than 100 municipalities have enacted ordinances authored by the Legal Defense Fund.

    ####

    >^..^^..^^..^

  2. Can anyone tell the community what the status is on the petition to enlist the Coaster under the ESA? Has there been a decision regarding the status of the Coaster?

  5. When accessing the Mining Journal Website I encountered an error message. I clicked on,
    http://www.mining-journal.com. This was definitely not the UPs biggest paper. I searched the site for Rio Tinto and found recent articles about a hostile buyout of Rio Tinto by a company named BHP Billiton Ltd.

    “BHP Billiton has been told by European Union regulators that its US$69 billion hostile bid for rival Rio Tinto could break antitrust rules, dampening widespread speculation that the mega-merger would receive approval.”
    Publish Date: 24 Oct 2008
    Author:Mike Lovesey

    Any ideas about how this might affect Kennecott’s plans or does this only effect European operations.

  6. From today’s (11/04/2008) NYTimes editorial page:

    Interior also is awaiting E.P.A.’s concurrence on a proposal that would make it easier for mining companies to dump toxic mine wastes in valleys and streams.