Investigation into processing of Eagle Project Mine Application appears a “whitewash”

Posted on by

On March 9, 2007, representatives of a number of environmental groups sent a letter to Michigan Department Environmental Quality Director Steven Chester regarding numerous grave concerns with MDEQ in connection with its review of the application filed by Kennecott Eagle Minerals Company. Click to read the letter to Steven Chester (PDF)

The report issued yesterday by a “independent” retired DNR official, Dr. Donald Inman of EcoLogic Ltd, regarding the investigation into the Processing of the Kennecott Eagle Minerals Company Eagle Project Mine Application appears to us to be an institutional whitewash. Click to read the MDEQ report (PDF)

Please read our letter, read the report and then YOU decide.

3 thoughts on “Investigation into processing of Eagle Project Mine Application appears a “whitewash””

  1. As you have suggested, I have read both the report and the letter. I fully agree with the letter and I also contend that all of the questions posed in the letter MUST be answered. I don’t see how a mine of this type can possibly be safe for the environment in the area which it is proposed. The risks far outweigh any possible benefits.

  2. What a sad situation for Michigan. This mining issue should never be brought to fruition. I also feel this involves all of Michigan – not just the UP – and great strides should be made to let ALL know what Kennecot is trying to “pull”

  3. 1. Given the sensitivity of groundwater receptors (rivers and aquifers, shallow AND deep), it is essential that GW flow & quality be modeled. Water entering the mining shaft will be removed, thus impacting the regional water table and impacting the receptor into which the excess water is discharged.
    2. Tailings will be accumulated and will be an enormous source of acidic runoff capable of ruining surface waters and the regional drinking water aquifer.
    3. Potential impacts on Endangered Species should enable, and require, Federal EPA imvolvement.
    4. Since the mining effort is represented as a short-duration activity of 4-7 years, it is clear that Kennecott must be held to high and appropriate standards of design and protection up front; there will no way to clean up a mess afterward.